tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-51846086760422068.post8784479466619815825..comments2024-03-22T05:29:38.457-07:00Comments on Open Flask: Somebody Tell Me What These Numbers MeanBaranLabhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01806245988209508968noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-51846086760422068.post-68165424265281993482013-05-08T10:29:19.534-07:002013-05-08T10:29:19.534-07:00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tmhp_NEH12Yhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tmhp_NEH12YHRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05094700797764371724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-51846086760422068.post-63392265293768470722013-05-08T09:09:07.502-07:002013-05-08T09:09:07.502-07:00For my money, it's a question of marketing. Ex...For my money, it's a question of marketing. Example: You're a new professor, and you notice that proposals with "Total Synthesis" aren't garnering the funding they once did in the roaring '70s and '80s. So you tweak it: "Approach towards," "Development of," "Alkaloids in Medicine," etc. <br /><br />Honestly, among the journals I read regularly, I see a decent total synthesis reported every week. That's enough for a new 'Classics' book annually : )See Arr Ohhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09464185815368499346noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-51846086760422068.post-82305532229857856732013-05-07T13:26:25.129-07:002013-05-07T13:26:25.129-07:00It would be really interesting to correlate this w...It would be really interesting to correlate this with the amount of funding given to the relevant study sections (perhaps I am revealing my ignorance of the actual way that NIH money gets parceled out.) <br /><br />It would be interesting to know the time period where the US taxpayer was getting the most JACS pubs per dollar. Chemjobberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15932113680515602275noreply@blogger.com