Here’s a
behind the scenes look at one of our newest papers in JACS that highlights some nickel chemistry that we have developed! Phil has been interested for quite awhile now
in transition metal cross-coupling methodology.
A few ideas with various metals have bounced around the group, but
unfortunately nothing managed to stick.
Fortunately, Pep (commonly referred to as Dr. Pep around the lab) had a
lot of previous experience working with transition metals, and within a few
weeks of insanely hard work he got the first hit on a reaction that provided
the basis for the new paper. Inspired by our lab’s previous work with Barton
esters, Pep thought that maybe he could irradiate the Barton ester and trap the
resulting alkyl radical – before it recombines with the thiopyridyl radical –
with a preformed Ni-Ar complex, which could then reductively eliminate to give
a new sp2-sp3 C-C bond. The reaction not only worked but also gave a
decent yield (~50%)!!!
I was
actually in Phil’s office that same day, talking about some other ideas for
projects, when he looked at me and said, “There has been a breakthrough.” At
this point I was lucky enough to join Pep on the project. I had some experience
working with organozinc reagents and quickly realized that arylzinc coupling
partners could react without destroying the starting material, so we began our
optimization. I want to give a shout out to Paul Knochel and his group; we
prepared our organozinc reagents using methods they’ve published that are
user-friendly and easy to follow. At first we continued to irradiate the
reactions during the early stages of optimization, but it didn’t take too long
to realize that the reactions took place with essentially the same yield in the
complete absence of light!
While we
were getting serviceable yields of product using the Barton esters, they were
somewhat impractical (even though we didn’t need light). They required quite a
bit of care when preparing them (all flasks, separatory funnels, columns,
column fractions, etc had to be shielded from light), and even with careful
storage we found they would decompose, so felt like we were beating our heads
against the wall trying to optimize the reaction. Because of the problems
associated with the Barton esters, we switched other types of activating groups
for the carboxylic acid; in particular, we looked at N-hydroxyphthalimide (NHPI) esters and found that they also worked!
After a decent amount of the usual optimization screens (solvents, ligands, nickel
sources, etc), we found that these NHPI-esters worked pretty well (92% with
NiCl2•glyme and 93% with NiCl2•6H2O). We also found that for some substrates,
swapping out the NHPI ester for the more electron-withdrawn 4,5,6,7-tetrachloro-N-hydroxyphthalimide ester improved the yield;
notably, the ortho-substituted
anisole substrate 9 failed to give
anything more than 10% yield of the desired product, whereas simply switching
to the tetrachloro analogue provided a serviceable yield without any other
change to the reaction conditions!
While it’s
nice being able to isolate these esters and just weigh them out and dump them
into the reaction flask, a one-pot procedure to do both acid activation as well
as the cross-coupling reaction could be useful for someone who wants the
product as quickly as possible (time is money, right?). We found that activated esters employed in peptide
coupling such as HOAt and HOBt esters could be made in situ from HATU/HBTU and your favorite amine base like
triethylamine, and then the cross-coupling could be run in the same reaction
flask. In some cases, such as the
coupling of the 3-pyridyl zinc reagent, making the ester by this method
actually gave a higher yield than either the NHPI or 4Cl-NHPI esters for
substrate 31.
We found
that this reaction scaled pretty well up to one gram and probably even larger
scales if desired, and thanks to our collaborators Mike Schmidt and Martin
Eastgate from Bristol-Myers Squibb, it seems that employing these esters on
process scale is safe and viable. Pep and I also want to thank Tian, Shuhei,
Jie, and Eddie for jumping on board and helping us to finish up the substrate
table in about 2 days and Ryan for lending his expertise on Barton esters. It
was great working with all of these guys!
One nice
thing about this reaction is that it’s easy to run; it doesn’t require rigorous
drying of glassware, and once you have a solution of your arylzinc reagent
(many of which are commercially available or can be prepared in a
straightforward manner (even one of our first-years managed to do it right on
his first attempt J)), the reaction is just dump
and stir at room temp overnight! No
fancy equipment is required, and you get to see some pretty cool colors! Even though I’ve run this reaction probably close
to 1000 times, seeing the color change from green/blue to orange is always
exciting. Just as a note, we recommend that you run this reaction with inhibitor-free THF, as we found using THF with BHT dramatically decreased the yield.
We are
very excited about extending this work to new reactions: sp3-sp3
C-C bond formation, alternative transition metal catalysis, construction of
quaternary centers, enantioselective reactions, and applications in total
synthesis only represent a small portion of the myriad of directions we plan to
take this chemistry.
If you’re curious about what it’s
actually like to run this reaction and want to try it for yourself, we’ve included
a step-by-step pictorial guide in the Supporting Information section that
details the entire process of the reaction.
We’ve tried to be as specific as possible, but if you have any
questions, please feel free to email me (jedwards@scripps.edu) or Pep (cornella@scripps.edu)!
Thanks for reading!
Thanks for being supportive all these days at the back of
the fumehood!