Thanks to LEO Pharma for providing unlimited quantities of the key intermediate! |
After successfully oxidizing the C-12 position (easily predictable based on 100 years of C–H oxidation literature), attention turned to the C-13 position and re-closure of the cyclopropane. This synthetic strategy became
reality by the invention of the cascade reaction shown below. The cyclopropane
ring was opened to install the C-12/13 oxygen atoms, but reclosure of it was
not successful because of the subsequent 1,2-shift. This unwanted 1,2-shift was
avoided by forming an hemiorthoester so that C-13 hydroxy group is protected
with an acetyl group along with the following retro-aldol reaction. This
electron withdrawing group completely prevented the 1,2-shift after
cyclopropanation to give the desired cyclopropane compound with C-12/13 oxygen
atoms. This cascade reaction (from the corresponding tertiary alcohol
without the TFA group) was all done in a single reaction flask, on a gram-scale, without any
aqueous workup, filtration or purification.
13 transforms - one reaction flask... |
Lastly, I would like to show you one of the unexpected
problems we faced in this synthesis, which is not described in the paper. As you
can see below (this is just part of my notes when I was working on the
screening, so sorry for the mess), oxidation of the alkene (or diol) to the
corresponding diketone was a real challenge.
A typical summary of reaction optimization. Every step of the synthesis was a methodology project... |
If you are interested in this synthesis, please take a look
at the paper. I hope you can find something interesting there. Also, if you
have any questions, please feel free to contact us.
-Shuhei Kawamura
Really nice piece of work.
ReplyDeleteI always enjoy reading your blog posts almost as much as reading your papers, keep it up!
Best,
Mauro
Thanks so much Mauro!
DeleteFeed Burner doesn't work any more..
ReplyDelete"Back to Heterocycles!" is the latest article.
Have some ideas?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSorry for double-posting.
ReplyDeleteOne thing I wanted to ask you is how you came up with the oxidizer for RuCl3.
Typically, one would use periodate as the terminal oxidant in RuCl3 catalyzed oxidations, which leads to RuO4, and this is a pretty nonselective vigorous oxidant (that can take methoxyphyphenyl group down to a carboxyl).
NaBrO3 is presumably a milder reagent, I liked it for oxidation of thiols to disulphides and benzylic alcohols to acetophenones. Please do you have an isight, or was it a lit precedent/a stroke of luck? Does it produce a different oxidation state of Ru - i.e. Ru(VII)?
I started with conditions for ketohydroxylation of olefins (Plietker, B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1919-1929.). Then, conditions were optimized as you can see above. It's only showing part of it but various oxidants were screened to find a suitable oxidation state of the ruthenium for this reaction. NaBrO3 is used for preparing TPAP from RuCl3 so I was assuming that the active species would be Ru (Vll) but we didn't do any mechanistic studies. Also, it's really important to have homogeneous reaction mixture. Once the water layer is separated from the organic layer, you will see different products. This might be because of the C-C bond cleavage though I didn't analyze these byproducts very closely (at least they were not simple aldehydes or carboxylic acids). In some conditions, I also detected C-C bond cleavage on the side chain (forming methyl ketone). Anyway, this reaction was really clean as long as the optimized conditions were used, which didn't even require column purification.
Delete-Shuhei
Congratulations! I think it’s a great work.
ReplyDeleteI have one thing I’d like to ask you.
Going from compound 15 to 16, how do you rationalize the stereoselectivity at C10?